prolly stupid question
06-09-2005, 07:31 PM
#9
www.sicriders.com
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 784
Re: prolly stupid question
Scotts is definitely NOT better.
GPR is the best and this is why (I have both by the way, so I'm not just blowing smoke)
The scotts uses a round pin into a round hole in the arm with a small diameter pin to hold them together. this pin shears easily and when you need it most.
GPR uses a square pin into a square hole, so obviously it cannot fail by shearing some crappy lil pin. Also, GPR has a much larger diameter piston (better), has more adjustment postitions that are marked(better than scotts with no markings), and you can fully rotate either direction to get from hard to soft- you can go from hardest to softest in one click(where scotts can only rotate one direction to increase or decrease response)
GPR is the best and this is why (I have both by the way, so I'm not just blowing smoke)
The scotts uses a round pin into a round hole in the arm with a small diameter pin to hold them together. this pin shears easily and when you need it most.
GPR uses a square pin into a square hole, so obviously it cannot fail by shearing some crappy lil pin. Also, GPR has a much larger diameter piston (better), has more adjustment postitions that are marked(better than scotts with no markings), and you can fully rotate either direction to get from hard to soft- you can go from hardest to softest in one click(where scotts can only rotate one direction to increase or decrease response)
06-09-2005, 10:55 PM
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: jacksonville
Age: 35
Posts: 1,378
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
