Opinions Please
#1
Opinions Please
My insurance company decided to total out my wrecked truck, so I've been looking for a replacement. I've narrowed it down to these two:
1997 Dodge Dakota
38,000 miles
5.2L V-8, 5-speed transmission
$7800.00
http://images.autotrader.com/images/...MAIN.565x421_A
1999 Dodge Ram 1500
30,500 miles
5.2L V-8, 5-speed transmission
$9000.00
http://images.autotrader.com/images/....MAIN.565x421_
Both trucks are in excellent condition. The Ram is newer, it's worth more, and it even has 6000 miles worth of factory warranty left on it. However, I prefer the looks of the Dakota, and it would be easier to maneuver because it's smaller. It would probably be significantly faster, too, and it would probably get better fuel economy.
I can't make up my mind. Suggestions?
And I do not want to hear "buy a Chevy!"
1997 Dodge Dakota
38,000 miles
5.2L V-8, 5-speed transmission
$7800.00
http://images.autotrader.com/images/...MAIN.565x421_A
1999 Dodge Ram 1500
30,500 miles
5.2L V-8, 5-speed transmission
$9000.00
http://images.autotrader.com/images/....MAIN.565x421_
Both trucks are in excellent condition. The Ram is newer, it's worth more, and it even has 6000 miles worth of factory warranty left on it. However, I prefer the looks of the Dakota, and it would be easier to maneuver because it's smaller. It would probably be significantly faster, too, and it would probably get better fuel economy.
I can't make up my mind. Suggestions?
And I do not want to hear "buy a Chevy!"
#2
Re: Opinions Please
Originally posted by Triple
I prefer the looks of the Dakota, and it would be easier to maneuver because it's smaller. It would probably be significantly faster, too, and it would probably get better fuel economy.
I prefer the looks of the Dakota, and it would be easier to maneuver because it's smaller. It would probably be significantly faster, too, and it would probably get better fuel economy.
#4
Hate to say it but Merlin is right...if your looking for good fuel economy a V8 dogde truck is the last place you should be looking. But between the two, the full size is probably a better value....I think your fuel economy will be similar between the trucks if they are optioned similarly. (ie. both 4wd and both extended cab or something)
#5
Originally posted by BlutoSigPi
Hate to say it but Merlin is right...if your looking for good fuel economy a V8 dogde truck is the last place you should be looking.
Hate to say it but Merlin is right...if your looking for good fuel economy a V8 dogde truck is the last place you should be looking.
DJ Lit, I don't think I've already made up my mind. It's in my nature to agonize over stupid material things like this. Both trucks have a lot going for them. If they were both 99's, then I would definitely get the Dakota. But I just can't get over the fact that the Dakota has been on the road for 6 years already...
#7
I don't have a pic handy of the Dakota, but here's the Ram:
http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/...583584_ram.jpg
It's a little "Grandpa-ish." I guess I could change that with some subtle mods, though. The Dakota is definitely a lot cooler looking.
http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/...583584_ram.jpg
It's a little "Grandpa-ish." I guess I could change that with some subtle mods, though. The Dakota is definitely a lot cooler looking.
#9
Originally posted by fastfingerjay
drop it down about 10 inchs, put some wires and hydraulics and some curb feelers and your ready to put the sound system in...:D :D :D
drop it down about 10 inchs, put some wires and hydraulics and some curb feelers and your ready to put the sound system in...:D :D :D
#11
Originally posted by fastfingerjay
drop it down about 10 inchs, put some wires and hydraulics and some curb feelers and your ready to put the sound system in...:D :D :D
drop it down about 10 inchs, put some wires and hydraulics and some curb feelers and your ready to put the sound system in...:D :D :D
#12
Originally posted by Triple
Hey, man, even "Grandpa-ish" is better than "***-ish." :D :D :D
Hey, man, even "Grandpa-ish" is better than "***-ish." :D :D :D
O.K. then raise it 23 inchs by some 33 inch standtall tires, a roll bar, a deer guard and a gun rack for the back window and most important item.................a bumper sticker that says I'd rather be muddin'
#13
Originally posted by fastfingerjay
O.K. then raise it 23 inchs by some 33 inch standtall tires, a roll bar, a deer guard and a gun rack for the back window and most important item.................a bumper sticker that says I'd rather be muddin'
O.K. then raise it 23 inchs by some 33 inch standtall tires, a roll bar, a deer guard and a gun rack for the back window and most important item.................a bumper sticker that says I'd rather be muddin'
#15
No, seriously, I saw a rear-view picture of the truck, and it really already has a big #3 sticker in the back window... not sure what I should think about that...
I'm leaning towards the Ram, though. It costs more, but there's a reason. I guess it can do almost everything the Dakota could, just with more space.
I'm leaning towards the Ram, though. It costs more, but there's a reason. I guess it can do almost everything the Dakota could, just with more space.
#17
Well I don't know about the two examples you gave for fuel mileage, but I currently own a 2002 Ram 1500 2wd and it has a 28 gallon tank and gets about 13 mile to a gallon. So if it fuel mileage that you are looking for, buy a metro.
By the way, the Ram is one of the best vehicles i ever owned.
By the way, the Ram is one of the best vehicles i ever owned.
#18
okay mine as well throw in my .02
1.look at how far you have to drive in order to even worry about gas milage??
2.do you carry passengers that often...then you have to worry about space???
3.do you haul alot because then you would need a bigger bed????
those are the things i would go off of
1.look at how far you have to drive in order to even worry about gas milage??
2.do you carry passengers that often...then you have to worry about space???
3.do you haul alot because then you would need a bigger bed????
those are the things i would go off of
#19
Originally posted by Triple
Uh, I don't know what planet you guys have been driving on, but I have lots of experience with Dakotas, Rams, and full size Chevy trucks, and the Mopars have all kicked the holy **** out of the GM machines when it came to both performance and-- especially-- fuel economy. My last V-8 Dakota was averaging about 25 highway mpg, and the last Ram in the family was a regular 22-24. My stepdad's latest 5.7L Chevy? Try 12 to 17, max. It's been my experience that our V-8 Dodges get way better mileage than even GM's 4.3L V-6. My mom's last Jimmy never broke 20 mpg. Sounds like you guys either got some bad information, or just had some lousy experiences with your trucks.
DJ Lit, I don't think I've already made up my mind. It's in my nature to agonize over stupid material things like this. Both trucks have a lot going for them. If they were both 99's, then I would definitely get the Dakota. But I just can't get over the fact that the Dakota has been on the road for 6 years already...
Uh, I don't know what planet you guys have been driving on, but I have lots of experience with Dakotas, Rams, and full size Chevy trucks, and the Mopars have all kicked the holy **** out of the GM machines when it came to both performance and-- especially-- fuel economy. My last V-8 Dakota was averaging about 25 highway mpg, and the last Ram in the family was a regular 22-24. My stepdad's latest 5.7L Chevy? Try 12 to 17, max. It's been my experience that our V-8 Dodges get way better mileage than even GM's 4.3L V-6. My mom's last Jimmy never broke 20 mpg. Sounds like you guys either got some bad information, or just had some lousy experiences with your trucks.
DJ Lit, I don't think I've already made up my mind. It's in my nature to agonize over stupid material things like this. Both trucks have a lot going for them. If they were both 99's, then I would definitely get the Dakota. But I just can't get over the fact that the Dakota has been on the road for 6 years already...
#20
Originally posted by BlutoSigPi
Well I have a buddy with 5.9 durango...he gets about 13mpg...even less in the city. Another friend has a ram with the 4.7 and gets about 15ish I think
Well I have a buddy with 5.9 durango...he gets about 13mpg...even less in the city. Another friend has a ram with the 4.7 and gets about 15ish I think
And definitely no bull-****, here-- I was averaging a solid 25 mpg on my way home from Tampa with my last 5-speed Dakota, before I got nailed in Atlanta and the truck was wrecked. The Dakota I had before that was a 4x4 5.2L w/ an automatic, and it was always good for at least 20 mpg. My uncle currently owns a 5.2L Ram, and reports an average 20, as well. That's one major reason why I stick with Dodge over GM. That, and they look a lot cooler. :D
But, yeah, I'm going Ram for sure. I've made up my mind, maybe try and pick it up next weekend (it's out of state, too).