Live Free or Die-NH
11-10-2003, 08:17 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Weare, NH
Age: 47
Posts: 595
Live Free or Die-NH
http://www.thewmurchannel.com/news/2619895/detail.html
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery
Decision Comes In Divorce Appeal
POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.
The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.
Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.
In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery
Decision Comes In Divorce Appeal
POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.
The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.
Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.
In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.
11-10-2003, 09:04 AM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 44
Posts: 4,250
Re: Live Free or Die-NH
Originally posted by superchicken
http://www.thewmurchannel.com/news/2619895/detail.html
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery
Decision Comes In Divorce Appeal
POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.
The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.
Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.
In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.
http://www.thewmurchannel.com/news/2619895/detail.html
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery
Decision Comes In Divorce Appeal
POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.
The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.
Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.
In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.
11-10-2003, 09:20 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 44
Posts: 4,250
Originally posted by superchicken
my guess would be no, otherwise why would any of this have happened? He must be really glad its all over the news too...........
my guess would be no, otherwise why would any of this have happened? He must be really glad its all over the news too...........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ActionSportsVid
Stunt Bike Videos and Reviews
2
06-10-2013 01:10 AM
odkpj56
Stunt Discussion
0
04-23-2013 03:16 AM
